Archive for July, 2011

• Dogs’ Ears – Chemical Or Natural Strategy to Infection?

  Date: 2011.07.24 | Category: Chemical treatment info | Response: 0

  Whilst researching looking online I noticed a powerful debate raging amongst a particular group within the dog health community, moreover the people whose dogs’ ears had a yeast infection. To interrupt it down simply it consisted of two groups. Those that were in support of finding natural techniques to solve the less serious problems their pets encountered and people who would go for the pharmaceutical/chemical approach at all times for their dog’s ears. It was interesting to look at two teams of people fighting with nothing greater than a complete refusal to even look at the facts either was presenting. It wasn’t the truth that everyone seemed to be the best choice about them that bothered me, it had been the truth that there was a bunch of dogs With no voice behind any of them. It’s at this point Let me demonstrate some facts.

  No dogs’ ears with no dog is identical. Man has seen to that for thousands of years by re-breeding them to create new breeds and all the while being in total control of the dog’s diet and lifestyle. In either case, it is impossible to say that what works for one dog is useful for the next one. To argue about this is pointless. Some dogs tend to be more vulnerable to illnesses than the others, some dogs get ill eating meat (What?), some dogs have been bred not have hair! As well as in all of this time a huge industry has grown that makes food for dogs. Dogs don’t complain around humans and do not always tell us when they have a poor belly, additionally they don’t complain towards the food manufacturers when the meals are no good. Does anyone really think that whenever the farms produce the meals for humans, just the best adopts pet food? Would you eat it?

  Most allergies, including ongoing, returning yeast infections in dogs’ ears and bacterial equivalents, are the result of an eating plan that’s so radically different to the things they ought to be eating it’s breathtaking. The sad thing is very few pet owners either understand what will work for their dogs or how their dog really is enjoying their food. Pretty easy for the dog food manufacturers.

  So the foods no good plus they get allergies and illness, then what?….Go into the “Antibiotics and the pharmaceutical world”. So many people I run into whose dogs’ ears possess a candidiasis, they go to the vets and get some antibiotics for any hefty price, the dogs’ ears improve. Then three weeks later the dogs’ ears come with an infection again, they go to the vets and get antibiotics for any hefty price, the dogs’ ears improve. 3 weeks later….You receive the image. This cycle of antibiotics does not good whatsoever. It depletes the dogs’ ears of the natural capability to fight the illness. He/she becomes determined by the antibiotics to recover. Please be aware. At no point do I advocate not going to the vets, it’s important to find out exactly what is wrong with your dog. Indeed one span of antibiotics is unlikely to harm your dog in anyway. Prolonged use for returning cases however doesn’t serve any purpose. And it is in these cases I believe that we have a duty to consider alternatives.

  Think about it for any second. John the dog is allergic to the manufactured pet food he needs to eat. The dogs’ ears get a yeast infection. He gets antibiotics, this kills off good bacteria that fights the yeast. He’s now less resistant against attack from illness but he’s eating food he’s allergic to and he can’t say or do anything whatsoever about this. Meanwhile John’s owner thinks his meals are fine, John’s just received another dogs’ ears infection, best reunite with him towards the vets. The cycle continues, John gets more ill, John’s owner gets more in debt. Other people seem to do very well out of it. Sad really.

  In case your dogs’ ears have a one off yeast/any ear infection, encourage them to the vets and take their advice. If, however after multiple attempts to solve the problem you are still going back, again and again, then it is time to search for alternatives. Sadly many of the specifics of this is heavily scattered around the web and it’s hard to get hold of and make comparisons for yourself. Look after your dogs’ ears

• Microwave Termite Treatment Device – Why Was it Invented?

  Date: 2011.07.24 | Category: Chemical treatment info | Response: 0

  A dilemma within the pest industry began to occur during the late 1980s. The general public was becoming a lot more health conscience educated concerning the real hazards and lethal medical risks related to even the smallest amount of contact with toxic elements. Interest in non-chemical alternatives or natural means of treatment had become clearly apparent like a growing public need to be fulfilled. Technology needed discovery to ensure that the pest industry to fulfill these new customer needs.

  1. No proven non-toxic termite treatments available.

  In early 1990’s the only way of non chemical alternative healthcare available to the pest management industry for replacing whole structure poison gas fumigation, was long-term franchise agreements for the utilization of an electrocution method or costly sub contracting of other experimental treatment methods which were not available for rent or purchase, i.e. heat or freeze methods.

  2. Public demand creates necessity to invent.

  Frustrated using the limited choices available, Two California termite control firms with combined many years of professional knowledge in fumigation as well as termite control, Jointly set out to create a safe, effective, practical and affordable termite treatment procedural method that could kill termites within inaccessible wall and void areas of structures without having the use of tents, poison gas fumigants or lethal toxins. The outcomes of the two termite companies combined efforts delivered the first commercially accessible microwave termite device treatment system.

  Development of the microwave termite treatment System is caused by the joint efforts undertaken by two companies to fulfill an industries need. Had there not been a need the system might not exist today.